2011 (12) TMI 528

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....y this Court in the order dated 29th November, 2010 in W.P. (C) Nos. 10418/2006 and 10434/2006. 2. Learned counsel for the parties state that as a short issued is involved, the matter may be heard and disposed of without reply/counter from the respondents. We accept the said prayer. 3. The petitioners herein had filed W.P. (C) Nos. 10418/2006 and 10434/2006 sometimes in the month of April, 2006 questioning the ?Mal Roko Adesh? or seizure memo issued by the respondents under the Value Added Tax Act, 2004 (for brevity, the Act). The petitioners had transported rubber products from Kerala to Bangalore after paying VAT in Kerala and then were handed over to Container Corporation of India Limited for being transported to Delhi. It is the c....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....pay the penalty of Rs. 7,04,628/- imposed upon M/s Aar Tee Transport Co. under section 86 of Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004 to be paid on or before 20.7.2006 issued by my predecessor Ld VATO has neither been interfered with by the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi or by any another authority. As such, the same stands and needs to be complied with by M/s Aar Tee Transport Company. Since, in compliance to the interim orders of Hon'ble High Court of Delhi an amount of Rs. 4.00 lacs has already deposited by M/s Aar Tee Transport Company, the firm is, therefore, directed to deposit the balance amount of Rs. 3,04,628/- (out of penalty of Rs. 7,04,628/-) together-with interest @ 15% p.a. by 15.11.2011 and submit the proof of payment in the shap....