<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (12) TMI 528 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174598</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the petitioners to file objections within an extended period regarding an order passed by the VATO under the Value Added Tax Act, 2004. The objections would not be dismissed on grounds of limitation, and no further recovery would occur until objections were resolved. The writ petition was disposed of with a clarification that objections would be decided based on the law and provisions of the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2015 17:04:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=401108" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (12) TMI 528 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174598</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the petitioners to file objections within an extended period regarding an order passed by the VATO under the Value Added Tax Act, 2004. The objections would not be dismissed on grounds of limitation, and no further recovery would occur until objections were resolved. The writ petition was disposed of with a clarification that objections would be decided based on the law and provisions of the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174598</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>