Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2015 (10) TMI 618

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.....B. Kanavi, CGSC, for the Respondent. ORDER Petitioner who is the absolute owner of the entire property bearing door No. 102, 4th Ward, Patel Nagar, Hospet, is seeking for quashing of both the intimation dated 7-1-2011 Annexure-E issued by 1st respondent and direction issued by 1st respondent to 3rd respondent vide communication dated 15-2-2011 Annexure-F whereunder petitioner has been calle....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Patel Nagar, Hospet, first floor portion has been leased by petitioner to Central Excise Department about 35 years back and on mutual consent, rate of rent has been enhanced from time to time. The Executive Engineer, Central Public Works Department, Hubli, has issued a Fair Rent Certificate as per Annexure-B certifying that monthly rent of the premises in occupation of Central Excise Department wo....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....eeable for negotiation in that regard. 5. However, Respondent No. 1 has intimated petitioner on 7-1-2011 to execute lease agreement from 19-8-2010 to 18-8-2015 accepting the enhanced rate of rent to Rs. 11,789/- per month and consequential arrears payable will be allowed only after petitioner executes a lease deed vide communication Annexure-E. Subsequently, 3rd respondent has issued a com....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....risdiction cannot examine as to the rate of rent to be fixed in respect of premises which is in occupation of the respondents. If petitioner is aggrieved by non-compliance of contractual obligation by the respondents, it is for the petitioner to approach civil court for redressal of his grievance. Even otherwise, under the Karnataka Rent Act, 1999, a provision is made for fixation of standard rent....