https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265343 The High Court dismissed the petition seeking quashing of intimation and lease deed execution, determination of monthly rent, and respondents' rent enhancement. The court held that extraordinary jurisdiction cannot address contractual matters and advised the petitioner to pursue civil court or Karnataka Rent Act remedies for rent fixation. Emphasizing the availability of legal avenues, the court rejected intervention through the writ petition, granting liberty to pursue standard rent fixation through appropriate proceedings. The court declined to interfere, highlighting the need to address rent disputes through established legal channels rather than seeking direct relief via extraordinary jurisdiction. en-us Fri, 17 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Oct 2015 12:05:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265343 The High Court dismissed the petition seeking quashing of intimation and lease deed execution, determination of monthly rent, and respondents' rent enhancement. The court held that extraordinary jurisdiction cannot address contractual matters and advised the petitioner to pursue civil court or Karnataka Rent Act remedies for rent fixation. Emphasizing the availability of legal avenues, the court rejected intervention through the writ petition, granting liberty to pursue standard rent fixation through appropriate proceedings. The court declined to interfere, highlighting the need to address rent disputes through established legal channels rather than seeking direct relief via extraordinary jurisdiction. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 17 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=265343