1993 (3) TMI 356

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....dia (Ms. Sushma Suri and Shri A. Subba Rao, Advocates with him), for the Appellants. Shri Soli J. Sorabji, Senior Advocate, (M/s. Kamal Parasurampuria, Vikas Singh, Manoj Wad and L.R. Singh, Advocates with him), for the Respondent. ORDER The challenge in this appeal is to the interim order dated July 30, 1992 passed in Writ Petition 1399/92 pending before the Bombay High Court. A Division....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he respondent-mills is not entitled to the payment of additional 5% CCS. According to the appellants the respondent-mills has been paid Rs. 201 lakhs towards the CCS at the rate of 8% and a further sum of Rs. 112.72 lakhs towards additional 5% CCS has also been paid by mistake. It is contended by the learned Counsel for the appellants that instead of Rs. 300.63 lakhs due to the respondent a sum of....