<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (3) TMI 356 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174485</link>
    <description>An interim direction requiring payment pending disposal of a writ petition was held inappropriate where the underlying entitlement to additional cash compensatory support still required final adjudication. The Court declined to examine the merits of the substantive dispute at the interim stage and treated monetary payment by way of interim relief as unwarranted on the facts before it. The interim order was therefore set aside, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2015 10:07:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=400684" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (3) TMI 356 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174485</link>
      <description>An interim direction requiring payment pending disposal of a writ petition was held inappropriate where the underlying entitlement to additional cash compensatory support still required final adjudication. The Court declined to examine the merits of the substantive dispute at the interim stage and treated monetary payment by way of interim relief as unwarranted on the facts before it. The interim order was therefore set aside, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174485</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>