2015 (10) TMI 92

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... By the Court:- 1. The petitioners have challenged the order dated 10.11.2009 (Annexure-1) passed by the District Magistrate (Collector), Jaipur, i.e. the respondent No.1 in the application being No.279/2009 filed by the respondent No.2 under Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred to as "the sa....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... under Section 14 was not appellable under Section 17 of the said Act, in view of the decision of the Apex Court in case of Harshad Goverdhandas Sondagar Versus International Asset Reconstruction Company Limited, (2014) 6 SCC 1. The petitioners, therefore, have filed the present petition again challenging the order dated 10.11.2009 passed by the respondent No.1 under Section 14 of the said Act. ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....f the petitioners with the help of Police. 4. At the outset, it is required to be stated that admittedly the petitioners have not paid any amount to the respondent-Bank towards the outstanding dues which are more than Rs. 40 lacs since 2007. It is further required to be noted that the petitioners have also not chosen to challenge the proceedings under Section 13, more particularly the notice gi....