2015 (9) TMI 876

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ent: Shri L. Patra, Authorised Representative Per: H.K. Thakur This appeal has been filed by the Appellant with respect to 06/2013(AHD-I)CE/AK/Commissioner(A)/AHD, dt.29.01.2013, under which OIO No. No.49/Addl.Commr/2009, dt.03.03.2009 was upheld. Adjudicating authority confirmed a demand of Rs. 5,87, 987.00 against the Appellant, alongwith interest, with respect to the finished goods which ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rough Para 5.4 of the OIA dt.29.01.2013 to argue that the demand in the present proceedings has been confirmed by the First Appellate Authority only on the ground that the issue in Appeal No.E/371/2009 has been referred to CESTAT Larger Bench. It was his case that once the issue of remission of duty on the finished goods destroyed has been decided in favour of the Appellant, then the confirmation ....