https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264208 The appeal was allowed, overturning the order that upheld a demand of Rs. 5,87,987.00 against the Appellant for finished goods destroyed before export. The decision was based on the precedent set by a previous case where the Larger Bench ruled in favor of the Appellant regarding remission of duty on destroyed goods. It was deemed unjustified to confirm the demand for the same goods after remission had been allowed. The Appellant's appeal was successful, and any consequential relief required was to be provided. en-us Thu, 16 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Sep 2015 06:03:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264208 The appeal was allowed, overturning the order that upheld a demand of Rs. 5,87,987.00 against the Appellant for finished goods destroyed before export. The decision was based on the precedent set by a previous case where the Larger Bench ruled in favor of the Appellant regarding remission of duty on destroyed goods. It was deemed unjustified to confirm the demand for the same goods after remission had been allowed. The Appellant's appeal was successful, and any consequential relief required was to be provided. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 16 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264208