2015 (9) TMI 530

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....: H.K. Thakur This appeal has been filed by the appellant against OIA No. SRP/554/VDR-II/2013 dated 13.03.2013. 2. Sh. Nikhil Virkar (Section Head) appearing on behalf of the appellant argued that first appellate authority has rejected the refund claim on the sole ground that 'Legal Consultancy Services' were not included in the list of services approved by the developer during the relevant peri....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d approved during the period of September 2010 to January 2011. 4. Heard both sides and perused the case records, it is observed from Clause 2 of Notification No. 9/2009-ST, dated 03.03.2009 and later claim considered under Notification No. 17/2011-ST, the exemption by way of refund is admissible if, the services are approved by the developer or unit of SEZ. It is claim of the appellant that comm....