https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263862 The appellant appealed against the rejection of their refund claim for 'Legal Consultancy Services' not being included in the approved list during the relevant period. The court noted the necessity of a certificate from the developer confirming the approval of services for that period. The first appellate authority's decision was set aside, and the case was remanded to the Adjudicating Authority for reconsideration. The appellant was instructed to provide the required certificate and given the opportunity for a personal hearing before a final decision. The appeal was allowed for further proceedings. en-us Fri, 20 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 11 Sep 2015 13:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263862 The appellant appealed against the rejection of their refund claim for 'Legal Consultancy Services' not being included in the approved list during the relevant period. The court noted the necessity of a certificate from the developer confirming the approval of services for that period. The first appellate authority's decision was set aside, and the case was remanded to the Adjudicating Authority for reconsideration. The appellant was instructed to provide the required certificate and given the opportunity for a personal hearing before a final decision. The appeal was allowed for further proceedings. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 20 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263862