1998 (8) TMI 595

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....aya Printing Press v. State of Maharashtra). answered in the negative the following question referred to it under the provisions of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 : Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in law in holding that the supply of printed material to Madhya Pradesh Electricity Board by the applicant was a sale and not a works contract ? 2. T....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....reafter they became the property of the Board; while the property in these goods passed to the Board, this was, in the very nature of things, only incidental or ancillary to the contract of printing. The High Court laid stress on this Court's judgment in State of Tamil Nadu v. Anandam Viswanathan [1989] 73 STC 1 where the printing and supply of question papers to a university was involved. Thi....