TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2015 (7) TMI 579
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....pondent : Mr. Kumar Desai, Advocate with Mr. Mihir Mody and Mr. Pratham V. Masurekar, Advocates Per : J.P. Devadhar (Oral) 1. These two appeals are filed by the appellants to challenge ex parte orders passed by adjudicating officer of Securities and Exchange Board of India ('SEBI') both dated January 20, 2014. By those two orders, penalty of Rs. 5 lac and Rs. 15 lac have been imposed upon the ap....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....h no order as to costs. Per : A. S. Lamba This appeal has been filed by Vikas Valunji (appellant) against order no. JJ/AC/AO-11-13/2014 dated January 20, 2014 by adjudicating officer, imposing penalty of Rs. 5,00,000/- on appellant for violation of Regulation 14(1) of SAST Regulations, 1997, under Section 15H(ii) of SEBI Act, 1992. 2. As per facts of the case appellant had entered into shares P....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....orrespondence to registered office of VAL, is not reaching appellant. Learned counsel for respondent stated that all notices to appellant were sent by speed post at residential address of appellant, which have been duly serviced on appellant and proof of service of all notices is available with respondent. 4. On a query from Hon'ble Presiding Officer whether service of notices by speed post is re....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....d to that person or his duly authorised agent, or by speed post or by such courier service, as may be approved by the Board or by any other means of transmission of documents including Fax message or electronic mail service, which affords a record of delivery, is a proper service and hence contention of appellant that he did not received copies of any of the notices, in connection with the case, i....