https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261618 The Tribunal set aside the ex parte orders passed by the adjudicating officer of SEBI, directing SEBI to issue show cause notices to the appellants for proper service. An appeal against the penalty for violating Regulation 14(1) of SAST Regulations, 1997 was upheld due to a delayed public announcement. The imposition of the penalty under Section 15H(ii) of SEBI Act, 1992 was affirmed as proper notice delivery via speed post was deemed acceptable, despite the appellant's claim of non-receipt. en-us Fri, 20 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 Jul 2015 10:09:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261618 The Tribunal set aside the ex parte orders passed by the adjudicating officer of SEBI, directing SEBI to issue show cause notices to the appellants for proper service. An appeal against the penalty for violating Regulation 14(1) of SAST Regulations, 1997 was upheld due to a delayed public announcement. The imposition of the penalty under Section 15H(ii) of SEBI Act, 1992 was affirmed as proper notice delivery via speed post was deemed acceptable, despite the appellant's claim of non-receipt. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 20 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261618