2015 (5) TMI 560

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ne For the Respondent : Shri Ranjan Khanna, DR ORDER Per: Rakesh Kumar: This is an application filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise- Chandigarh for rectification of mistake apparent from records, in respect of the Tribunal's final order no. 58683/2013 dated 18/12/2013. 2. The period of dispute in this case is 1/7/1999 onwards. The appellants being Hot Re-Rolling Steel Mil....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... filed an appeal to Hon'ble Punjab and Haryana High Court against this order of-the Tribunal pleading that since the actual production of the appellant during 1996-97 was higher, in accordance with the Rule 5 of the HRSMAC Rules, the annual capacity of production has to be determined on the basis of the actual production during 1996-97. Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court vide order dated ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Mills.vide order dated 6/7/2011 in CA No. 3400/03, decided the issue in the favour of Revenue. 4. Based on the order dated 26/8/2011 of Hon'ble Punjab and Haryana High Court, Tribunal passed the final order no. 58683/2013 dated 18/2/2013 which is reproduced below: "In accordance with the order dated 26/8/2011 in GCR no. 2/2003(O&M) of Hon'ble High Court of Punjab & Haryana answering ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....er dated 18/12/2013, the Revenue's appeal has been allowed following the order of the High Court in respect of the reference application. Another mistake pointed out by the Commissioner is that the correct date of the Tribunal's orders is "9/10/2000" and not "9/10/2010". 6. None present for the appellant. 7. Heard Sh. Ranjan Khana ld. DR who explained that there is a clear mistake in....