https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259686 The Tribunal exercised rectification jurisdiction where its earlier order contained an apparent record error: it noted an incorrect date and retained a survival clause inconsistent with the final disposal. Because the underlying reference had already been decided against the assessee and in favour of the Department, the inconsistent sentence could not stand. The apparent mistake was corrected by deleting the offending sentence from the earlier order. en-us Fri, 06 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 May 2015 07:32:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259686 The Tribunal exercised rectification jurisdiction where its earlier order contained an apparent record error: it noted an incorrect date and retained a survival clause inconsistent with the final disposal. Because the underlying reference had already been decided against the assessee and in favour of the Department, the inconsistent sentence could not stand. The apparent mistake was corrected by deleting the offending sentence from the earlier order. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 06 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259686