2015 (5) TMI 378

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....(SR.), SRI.K.M.FIROZ, SMT.M.SHAJNA, SRI.S.KANNAN, ADVOCATES FOR THE RESPONDENT : SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN JUDGEMENT The validity of Exts.P9 and P10 revised assessment orders passed by the fourth respondent in respect of the assessment years 2005-2006 is under challenge in this writ petition. 2. The sequence of events given in the writ petition shows that the petit....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... P6 and P7 notices under Section 25(1). Said notices are dated 2.7.2014. Though the petitioner sought for reasonable time to file reply, the same was not acceded to and the assessing authority simply proceeded to finalize the proceedings on the basis of his own convictions, leading to Exts. P9 and P10 orders, which in turn are under challenge. 3. Heard Mr. K.B. Mohammedkutty, the learned Senio....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....record, this Court finds that the assessing officer, by issuance of pre-assessment notice to the petitioner, granted only three days' time for filing objection. The fact that the petitioner sought for adjournment for filing reply and for producing the books of accounts stands conceded in Exts. P9 and P10 orders itself. The version of the concerned respondent is that, since it is a long pending....