2015 (5) TMI 377
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....RESPONDENT : SENIOR GOVT.PLEADER SMT.SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN JUDGEMENT 1. The petitioner is challenging Ext.P3 assessment order, whereby huge liability to the tune of Rs. 6,65,047/- has been mulcted upon the shoulders of the petitioner. On receipt of Ext.P1 pre-assessment notice, the petitioner submitted Ext.P2 application for adjournment for production of Books of Accounts, which however was no....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e in this writ petition. 4. The correctness of inference is sought to be rebutted by the learned Counsel for the petitioner stating that the correct factual position could have been brought to light from the Books of Accounts and that unfortunately, the same could not be produced as it was kept in the audit office at Kottakkal; and hence the request for adjournment was made. 5. Ongoing throu....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....submits that the petitioner is ready to prove bonafides by effecting a portion of the deposit for causing the matter to be re-considered by the assessing authority. 6. In the above circumstance, this Court finds that the ultimate relief, if at all any, that could be desired and obtained by the petitioner in the appeal is only a remand to have the matter finalised with reference to the relevant ....
TaxTMI