2015 (5) TMI 208

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.....N.Surya Senthil For the Respondent : Mr.S.Kanmani Annamalai, Additional Government Pleader JUDGEMENT With consent of both parties, the writ petition is taken up for final hearing at the admission stage. 2. The petitioner, in this writ petition, has prayed for issuance of writ of certiorarified mandamus, to quash the goods detention notice dated 24.01.2014 issued by the respondent as b....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ehouse without any documents, hence, the goods were detained. 4. The petitioner is said to have represented before the Authority agreeing to pay a sum of Rs. 1,70,600/- and a cheque dated 25.1.2014 was handed over to the respondent and on receipt of the same, the goods were released. Subsequently, the cheque was given by the petitioner had bounced on account of 'insufficient funds'. The....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tted that the payment is being effected by the petitioner without prejudice to his right to contest the order passed by the respondent and liberty may be granted to the petitioner to file appropriate objection. Though notice dated 28.03.2014 demands interest for the said amount, this Court is of the view that the interest need not be demanded at this stage, since the issue is at threshold. 6. I....