Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Tools

We've upgraded AI Tools on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Tools

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2015 (5) TMI 208

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t : Mr.S.Kanmani Annamalai, Additional Government Pleader JUDGEMENT With consent of both parties, the writ petition is taken up for final hearing at the admission stage. 2. The petitioner, in this writ petition, has prayed for issuance of writ of certiorarified mandamus, to quash the goods detention notice dated 24.01.2014 issued by the respondent as being in violative of rules and principles o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s were detained. 4. The petitioner is said to have represented before the Authority agreeing to pay a sum of Rs. 1,70,600/- and a cheque dated 25.1.2014 was handed over to the respondent and on receipt of the same, the goods were released. Subsequently, the cheque was given by the petitioner had bounced on account of 'insufficient funds'. Therefore, by notice dated 28.03.2014, the respond....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....titioner without prejudice to his right to contest the order passed by the respondent and liberty may be granted to the petitioner to file appropriate objection. Though notice dated 28.03.2014 demands interest for the said amount, this Court is of the view that the interest need not be demanded at this stage, since the issue is at threshold. 6. In the light of the above, without setting aside the....