Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Tools

We've upgraded AI Tools on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Tools

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2015 (5) TMI 209

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....N FOR THE RESPONDENT : SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI LIJU STEPHEN JUDGEMENT Per: Antony Dominic: This Writ Appeal is filed against the judgment of the learned Single Judge disposing of W.P. (C)No. 18011/2008 filed by the appellant. The appellant is conducting a bar hotel. During the period from April 2005 to January 2006 and November 2006 and December, 2006, the appellant did not file its returns ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....f a copy of the judgment. It is this judgment which is under challenge before us. 3. We heard the learned Senior Counsel for the appellant and the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. 4. The learned Senior Counsel for the appellant relied on the judgment of this Court in Commissioner of Income-tax v. Chembara Peak Estates Ltd. [(1989)183 ITR 471] and T.R.Ramachandran v. Sale....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ntended that they were prevented from filing monthly returns in time for reasons beyond their control and that the business was at a loss and there was shortage of funds, etc. Before the Commissioner, the contention raised was that the breach was a technical one and therefore did not merit levy of penalty. These orders, therefore, show that the contention now raised before us that the business was....