<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 209 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259335</link>
    <description>Penalty under Section 45A of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act for failure to file returns and remit tax was sustained where the assessee had not raised, before the assessing, appellate, or revisional authorities, the plea that the default was a technical breach or due to reasons beyond its control. The record showed no objections to the penalty proposal before the assessing authority, and the grounds later urged in appeal were outside the issues actually raised below. As the penalty had already been reduced from double the tax to the tax amount, and penal interest had been waived, no further interference was warranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 May 2015 07:48:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=383994" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 209 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259335</link>
      <description>Penalty under Section 45A of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act for failure to file returns and remit tax was sustained where the assessee had not raised, before the assessing, appellate, or revisional authorities, the plea that the default was a technical breach or due to reasons beyond its control. The record showed no objections to the penalty proposal before the assessing authority, and the grounds later urged in appeal were outside the issues actually raised below. As the penalty had already been reduced from double the tax to the tax amount, and penal interest had been waived, no further interference was warranted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=259335</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>