Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty imposed for failure to file returns and remit tax under Section 45A of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act was liable to be interfered with on the ground that the default was a technical breach or was caused by reasons beyond the assessee's control.
Analysis: The appellant had not filed returns or remitted tax for the relevant periods, and proceedings under Section 45A were initiated. The plea that the default was due to reasons beyond control was not shown to have been raised before the assessing, appellate, or revisional authorities in the form now urged. The record showed that the appellant did not file objections to the proposal before the assessing authority, and the grounds subsequently pressed in appeal were outside the issues actually raised below. The penalty had already been reduced from double the tax to the tax amount, and the learned Single Judge had also waived penal interest, reflecting substantial leniency.
Conclusion: The challenge to the penalty was rejected and the penalty was sustained in favour of the Revenue.