2015 (4) TMI 648

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Rakesh Goyal, Additional Commissioner (AR) For the Respondent : Mr Ainekeya Patil, Adv. ORDER Per: P K Jain: Brief facts of the case are that two show cause notices, one dated 28.5.1992 and another dated 29.9.1993, were issued to the respondent. The same were adjudicated by a common order-in-original No. 41-42/1997 dated 16.10.1997, wherein the Commissioner dropped the proceedings. Th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ause notice dated 29.9.1993 is concerned, the same was dropped on limitation. 2. The miscellaneous application has been filed to decide the COD and ROM applications before deciding the main appeal. The Revenue filed rectification of mistake application along with condonation of delay application in respect of the second order. However, for some reasons the same could not be listed and decided b....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....High Court decision, also relied upon this Tribunal's decision in the case of CC, Ahmedabad vs. Palak Laser Video Club reported in 2006 (199) ELT 860 (Tri.-Mumbai). We are under almost the similar circumstances. The Tribunal held that the second order has to be considered as non est. 4. The learned counsel for the respondent opposed the contention. His main contention is that during the hea....