<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 648 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258767</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that its second order was invalid as it covered issues already decided in the first order regarding two show cause notices. The Commissioner was directed to proceed based on the first Tribunal order, deeming the second order non est. Legal principles of res judicata were applied, leading to the dismissal of the second order. Applications related to the case were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2015 12:27:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=382370" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 648 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258767</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that its second order was invalid as it covered issues already decided in the first order regarding two show cause notices. The Commissioner was directed to proceed based on the first Tribunal order, deeming the second order non est. Legal principles of res judicata were applied, leading to the dismissal of the second order. Applications related to the case were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258767</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>