2015 (4) TMI 377

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....#39;) and M/s Pawan Auto Wheels Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter, 'OP 4') have contravened the provisions of the Act in respect to provision of car maintenance and repairing services. 2. The Informant is stated to be the owner of a Hyundai i10 model car manufactured by OP 1. The OP 1 is a registered company, inter alia, engaged in manufacturing of cars in the brand name of Hyundai and sale them through its authorised dealers across the country. The OP 2, OP 3 and OP 4 are the authorized dealers/service centres of OP 1. 3. Briefly, the Informant stated that he had purchased a Hyundai i10 model car of OP 1 through OP 2 on 05.06.2009 which is duly registered in his name at Ghaziabad having registration number UP 14 AW 4982. As per the Warranty....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....or repair on 03.01.2013 with an estimate cost of repair for Rs. 20,000/-. 6. The Informant alleged that after being informed about the defects in the engine by OP 4, he requested for the internal report card from OP 3 which was refused. Somehow the Informant managed to obtain the internal report from OP 1 which showed that OP 3 had only repaired the bumper in 2011 and not the internal engine which was the main problem in the car. It was further alleged that OP 4 in connivance with OP 3 did not repair the engine in order to hide the inefficiency on the part of OP 3 in their previous repair work. It was done on behest of an ex-employee of OP 3, Mr. M.K. Bhatt who is now working with OP 4. 7. It has been further stated that the Informant rec....