https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258495 The Competition Commission of India concluded that the allegations of contravention of the Competition Act by several companies in car maintenance and repairing services did not establish a prima facie case. The Commission determined that the issues primarily related to service deficiencies, which fell outside the scope of competition law. Furthermore, the claims of collusion between the service centers were deemed unsubstantiated. Consequently, the case was closed under Section 26(2) of the Competition Act, and the order was distributed to all concerned parties. en-us Mon, 19 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 11 Apr 2015 01:36:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258495 The Competition Commission of India concluded that the allegations of contravention of the Competition Act by several companies in car maintenance and repairing services did not establish a prima facie case. The Commission determined that the issues primarily related to service deficiencies, which fell outside the scope of competition law. Furthermore, the claims of collusion between the service centers were deemed unsubstantiated. Consequently, the case was closed under Section 26(2) of the Competition Act, and the order was distributed to all concerned parties. Case-Laws Law of Competition Mon, 19 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258495