2015 (2) TMI 828

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... For the Respondent : Shri Rajesh Chibber, Advocate JUDGMENT Per Ashok Jindal : The Revenue is in appeal against the impugned order wherein the inputs Cenvat credit  on welding electrodes has been allowed by the learned Commissioner (Appeals) being capital goods during the period April, 2011 to February 2012. 2. As the welding electrodes  are not capital goods nor inputs, ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... vs. Union of India [2010 (252) ELT 355 (Bom)]  ii) CCE&ST Bhubaneshwar II vs. MSP Steel Pvt. Ltd. [2009 (248) ELT 845 (Tri-Kolkata)] iii) SAIL vs. CCE, Ranchi [2008 (222) ELT 233 (Tri-Kolkatta) iv) Steel Authority of India Ltd.  vs. Commissioner [2008( 229) ELT A 127 (SC)] 4. On the other hand, learned Counsel for the respondent submits that this Tribuna....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n the Hon'ble High Court after considering the decision of Apex Court in the case of Hindustan Zinc  held  that Cenvat credit  is admissible. He also relied on the decision of Ambuja Cement Eastern Ltd.  [2010-TIOL-309 HC-Chhattisgarh-CX). Therefore, he  prayed that impugned order is to be upheld. 5. Heard the parties. Considered the submissions. 6. Revenue is relyin....