Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2015 (2) TMI 827

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Order No. 41693/2014 dated 07.10.2014, this Bench directed the applicants to make a pre-deposit of Rs. 8,00,000/- within a period of six weeks and to report compliance on 05.12.2014. The appellants have complied the above said stay order. Since, the issue involved is in narrow compass, the main appeal itself is taken up for disposal. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the applicants have ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he applicant submits that they have not received the intimation notice of hearing fixed on 24.1.2013 by Commissioner (Appeals) in time as the intimation letter was addressed to the Swamy Associates. Therefore, they could not appear for hearing before the Commissioner (Appeals). He further submits that the Commissioner (Appeals) has passed the exparte order for pre-deposit without hearing on merit.....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....order. 4. After hearing both the sides and on perusal of the records, I find that the Commissioner (Appeals) has dismissed their appeal for non-compliance of the stay order. It is the submission of the appellant that they have not received the information of hearing fixed by the Commissioner (Appeals) and the stay order was passed exparte without hearing them on merits. Since, the appellant has....