Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2015 (2) TMI 374

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ation has been filed for orders on the respondents to return a sum of Rs. 10,50,000/- (rupees ten lakh fifty thousand) seized from the petitioners under a seizure memo, dated February 22, 2011, a copy of which has annexed to the writ petition as Annexure "P-2". 2. According to the petitioners, on or about 22nd February, 2011, a search was conducted by the officers of the Enforcement Director....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nt No. 1 seized the currency under the Panchanama dated February 22, 2011. 5. On February 22, 2011, summons was issued to the: petitioner No. 1 calling upon him to personally attend the office of the Deputy Director of Enforcement Directorate on February 23, 2011 to give evidence and to produce books of account and other documents specified in the Schedule to the said summons. There is not a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....fore the Christmas vacation, since this Bench was on circuit at Port Blair. The Court re-opened on January 3, 2013. On January 4, 2013, the writ application was called on for hearing. After hearing Mr. Meheta appearing on behalf of the petitioners, the matter was fixed for orders on January 9, 2013. Since no one had appeared on behalf of the respondents, this Court deemed it appropriate that the r....