<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 374 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256374</link>
    <description>The court ordered the return of Rs. 10,50,000 seized by the Enforcement Directorate from the petitioner&#039;s office premises, emphasizing the constitutional rights under Article 300A of the Constitution of India. The court criticized the lack of justification for the seizure, delays in legal proceedings, and absence of respondents, directing the return of the currency notes to the petitioner with accrued interest within a specified timeframe.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2015 12:52:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=375750" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 374 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256374</link>
      <description>The court ordered the return of Rs. 10,50,000 seized by the Enforcement Directorate from the petitioner&#039;s office premises, emphasizing the constitutional rights under Article 300A of the Constitution of India. The court criticized the lack of justification for the seizure, delays in legal proceedings, and absence of respondents, directing the return of the currency notes to the petitioner with accrued interest within a specified timeframe.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256374</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>