2015 (1) TMI 1197

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... : Shri Gagan Kohli, Advocate ORDER Per Ashok Jindal: The revenue is in appeal against the impugned order wherein penalties under section 76, 77 and 78 of the Finance Act 1994 has been dropped by the Ld. Commissioner (A). 2. The brief facts of the case are that during the course of the audit between the period 30.08.2006 to 31.08.2006, it was revealed that appellant has not paid the se....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... has been confirmed and admitted by the respondent for the extended period of limitation. Therefore, the respondent cannot escape the penalties under section 76, 77 & 78 of the Act. He drew our attention to the impugned order and submits that in the impugned order, penalties have been waived off by invoking under section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994. In fact, when extended period of limitation has ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... along with interest. Therefore, the show cause notice was not required to be issued to them. In these circumstances, he submits that impugned order requires to be upheld. 5. Heard the parties and considered the submissions. 6. We have gone through the impugned order. In the impugned order the Ld. Commissioner (A) has observed the contentions of the respondent that during the period involved....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....a Central Excise Officer before service of notice on him under sub-section (1) in respect of such service tax, and inform the Central Excise Officer of such payment in writing, who, on receipt of such information shall not serve any notice under sub-section (1) in respect of the amount so paid: Provided that the Central Excise Officer may determine the amount of short payment of service tax or ....