<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 1197 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255998</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Ld. Commissioner (A) to waive penalties under sections 76, 77, and 78 of the Finance Act 1994. It found that the respondent&#039;s payment of tax and interest before a show cause notice, coupled with their lack of awareness of new provisions and absence of fraud, justified the penalty waiver. The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, stating no infirmity was found in the decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2015 06:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=375024" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 1197 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255998</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Ld. Commissioner (A) to waive penalties under sections 76, 77, and 78 of the Finance Act 1994. It found that the respondent&#039;s payment of tax and interest before a show cause notice, coupled with their lack of awareness of new provisions and absence of fraud, justified the penalty waiver. The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, stating no infirmity was found in the decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255998</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>