2015 (1) TMI 126

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ri B.B. Sharma, D.R., for the Respondent. ORDER The appellants have engaged in the manufacture of MS ingots. On 23-9-2000, a truck carrying the ingots manufactured by the appellant was intercepted. The same was found to be accompanied with an invoice No. 305, dated 22-9-2000 showing the weight of the goods as 22.310 MT. The goods were weighed by the Central Excise officers in a nearby Dharma....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t, kanta has shown 33 instead of 38. It is therefore stated that difference of 5 MT in net weight is due to the figure missing on wrong reading by our weighment, as their weighing bridge is computerised without printer. 4. The appellant agree to deposit the differential duty of Rs. 46,523/- which was actually deposited by them 5. In the above, proceedings were initiated for confisc....