<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 126 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254927</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal set aside the impugned order related to the confiscation of goods and the truck, as well as the imposition of penalties on the appellant. The decision was based on acknowledging a potential human error in the computerized weight recording process, leading to the weight discrepancy. The appeal was disposed of in favor of the appellant, providing relief from the confiscation and penalties imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2015 09:16:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=372809" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 126 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254927</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal set aside the impugned order related to the confiscation of goods and the truck, as well as the imposition of penalties on the appellant. The decision was based on acknowledging a potential human error in the computerized weight recording process, leading to the weight discrepancy. The appeal was disposed of in favor of the appellant, providing relief from the confiscation and penalties imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=254927</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>