2014 (8) TMI 468
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....r (AR) PER : P R Chandrasekharan In these 3 appeals directed against Order-in-Appeal No. SRK/34/M.III/2007 dated 19.7.2007, No. SRK/416/M-III/2007 dated 31.10.2007 and No. YDB/130/M-II/2009 dated 29.10.2009 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Mumbai-II, a common issue is involved, therefore, they are being taken up together for consideration and disposal. 2. The appell....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ssable value of the goods supplied. Accordingly, show-cause notices were issued and demands confirmed along with interest and penalties. Aggrieved of the same, the appellant is before us. 3. None represented the appellant and there is a request for adjournment. 4. We have perused the appeal memorandum, wherein it is stated that they are undertaking erection, commission and installation activ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....be included in the assessable value of the goods supplied. 6. We have carefully considered the submissions made by both sides. 6.1 We also notice that this issue had come up several times before this Tribunal and this Tribunal has consistently held that erection, commissioning and installation activity undertaken and amount charged separately, cannot form part of the assessable value of the ....
TaxTMI