https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250518 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI allowed the appeals, setting aside the orders-in-appeal that sought to include erection, commission, and installation charges in the assessable value of goods supplied. The Tribunal found that such charges for services rendered should not be part of the assessable value, as they are distinct from the sale of goods. Citing relevant judicial precedents, including Supreme Court decisions, the Tribunal concluded that the demands to include these charges were not sustainable in law and provided consequential relief to the appellant. en-us Wed, 09 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 17 Aug 2014 09:13:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250518 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI allowed the appeals, setting aside the orders-in-appeal that sought to include erection, commission, and installation charges in the assessable value of goods supplied. The Tribunal found that such charges for services rendered should not be part of the assessable value, as they are distinct from the sale of goods. Citing relevant judicial precedents, including Supreme Court decisions, the Tribunal concluded that the demands to include these charges were not sustainable in law and provided consequential relief to the appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 09 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=250518