2014 (7) TMI 789

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....mber (T) Shri G.H. Pradyumna, Advocate, for the Appellant. Shri A.K. Nigam, AR, for the Respondent. ORDER After hearing both sides, we condone the delay of 8 days involved in the filing of the appeal, having found satisfactory explanation thereof. The COD application stands allowed. 2. The stay application seeks waiver and stay in respect of the adjudged dues. On hearing both s....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....batement of cost of materials from the gross value. The appellate authority held that the assessee should adduce evidence in this behalf to the original authority so that the said authority could requantify the demand of service tax. Accordingly, the matter was remanded to the original authority vide Order-in-Appeal No. 23/2007-S.T., dated 27-7-2007. Pursuant to this remand ordered by the learned ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....posed in the show-cause notice and also ordered for recovery of interest thereon. It is the revisionary order of the Commissioner that is under challenge in the present appeal. 4. After hearing both sides, we find that the order passed by the learned Commissioner (Appeals) was not challenged by the department. The appellate Commissioner clearly found a case in favour of the assessee and ac....