2014 (6) TMI 808

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Gupta, Vice-President: This appeal by the Revenue for the assessment year 1999-2000 is directed against the order of the CIT(A). 2. At the time of hearing, none appearing on behalf of the assesee. However, the assessee has filed written submission before the Tribunal with a request to consider the same while deciding the appeal of the Revenue. 3. The grounds of the appeal of the Revenue....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nd also written submissions filed by the assessee. We find that in the first round of litigation in the assessment case of the assessee, the CIT(A) vide order dated 15.1.2003 deleted the addition of Rs.9,96,455/- on account of current liabilities. The department preferred an appeal to the Tribunal, and the Tribunal has restored the matter to the file of the AO to reprocess the assessment on the is....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....on made by the AO on this count has been deleted whereas in the second round of litigation the same has been confirmed. The CIT(A) has observed that it is settled that when there were two divergent opinions are possible on an issue, penalty under section 271(1)(c) could not be levied. The CIT(A) has observed that the assessee has offered an explanation regarding sundry creditors which was not foun....