Appeal Dismissed: Penalty Deletion Upheld for AY 1999-2000

The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal against the deletion of penalty under section 271(1)(c) for the assessment year 1999-2000. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, emphasizing the disclosure of all material facts by the assessee and the divergent opinions in different rounds of litigation. The AO's acceptance of lease rentals from the same parties supported the assessee's case, leading to the confirmation of the CIT(A)'s order and the dismissal of the Revenue's appeal.

---

---

Issues: Appeal against deletion of penalty under section 271(1)(c) for assessment year 1999-2000.

Analysis:
1. Grounds of Appeal: The Revenue appealed against the deletion of penalty of Rs.3,48,760/- by the CIT(A), citing that the penalty was rightly imposed on the assessee for filing inaccurate particulars of income under section 271(1)(c) of the Act.

2. Contentions: The learned DR argued that the assessee filed inaccurate particulars of income, which was confirmed in appeal before the CIT(A), justifying the penalty imposed by the AO. The DR referred to the penalty order of the AO to support the Revenue's case.

3. Judicial Review: The Tribunal reviewed the orders of the AO and the CIT(A) along with the written submissions by the assessee. It was noted that the CIT(A) had deleted the addition of Rs.9,96,455/- in the first round of litigation, but the addition was confirmed in the second round based on the absence of correct party addresses and PAN details. The CIT(A) deleted the penalty under section 271(1)(c) citing a clear difference of opinion between the two CIT(A)s in separate rounds of litigation.

4. Decision: The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to delete the penalty, emphasizing that the assessee disclosed all material facts, and there were divergent opinions in different rounds of litigation. The AO accepted lease rentals from the same sundry creditor parties, supporting the assessee's case. Therefore, the Tribunal confirmed the CIT(A)'s order and dismissed the Revenue's appeal.

5. Conclusion: The appeal by the Revenue against the deletion of penalty under section 271(1)(c) for the assessment year 1999-2000 was dismissed by the Tribunal, affirming the CIT(A)'s decision based on the divergent opinions in separate rounds of litigation and the acceptance of lease rentals by the AO from the same parties.

---