2010 (3) TMI 1036
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....10<br>13499 of 2009 - -<br>Central Excise<br>S.H. Kapadia and Swatanter Kumar, JJ. JUDGMENT The Bombay High Court in its impugned order had held that the appeal order showed that two necessary ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....not complete and were completed only on production to certificate pursuant to the appeal order was unsustainable. The High Court also held that unless a finding is recorded that application that wa....
TaxTMI