<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 1036 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165299</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the Bombay High Court&#039;s decision, emphasizing that liability to pay interest cannot be denied without establishing the validity of the application under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The case was remanded for further proceedings to determine the correlation of necessary documents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 May 2017 10:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=358240" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 1036 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165299</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the Bombay High Court&#039;s decision, emphasizing that liability to pay interest cannot be denied without establishing the validity of the application under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The case was remanded for further proceedings to determine the correlation of necessary documents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165299</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>