2014 (5) TMI 653
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Prasad Paranjpe For the Respondents : Mr. Vijay Kantharia with Ms. Anamika Malhotra ORDER 1. This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeks issuance of a writ of certiorari or a writ in the nature of certiorari calling for records pertaining to the order in original dated 24.02.2014 passed by the Respondent No.3 and after scrutiny thereof, to quash and set aside t....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....t services. That is how the Petitioner claimed refund. The refund claim has been rejected by the Respondent No.3. It is claimed that similar exercise was carried out by the Respondent No.3 and this Court in its writ jurisdiction was pleased to quash and set aside the order and direct reconsideration of the refund claim. 3. The Respondent No.3 has rejected the entire refund application and in re....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ar orders although he was aware that the orders passed by him earlier and taking such view were quashed and set aside by this Court. 5. We have perused the Writ Petition with the assistance of Mr.Shah and Mr.Kantharia. We do not express any opinion on merits of the refund claim. However, we find that the Respondent No.3 has rejected the claim for refund and which is for the period October, 2012....


TaxTMI