https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247726 The Court quashed and set aside the order of Respondent No.3 rejecting the refund claim for the period October to December 2012. The Court found the rejection unjust as Respondent No.3 failed to consider individual facts and circumstances, contrary to previous directives. The Competent Authority was directed to reconsider the refund claim afresh within four weeks in accordance with the law. The Writ Petition was disposed of with no costs awarded. en-us Fri, 09 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Nov 2014 11:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247726 The Court quashed and set aside the order of Respondent No.3 rejecting the refund claim for the period October to December 2012. The Court found the rejection unjust as Respondent No.3 failed to consider individual facts and circumstances, contrary to previous directives. The Competent Authority was directed to reconsider the refund claim afresh within four weeks in accordance with the law. The Writ Petition was disposed of with no costs awarded. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 09 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247726