Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2012 (6) TMI 754

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....eal of the assessee is directed against rejection of a claim for refund of duty of Rs.2,16,643/- which is claimed to have been paid in excess during the period from May 2006 to January 2007. There is no representation for the appellant despite notice, nor any request for adjournment. There was no representation for the appellant on several previous occasions also and the listing of the case for to....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....oduced copies of relevant invoices, monthly returns together with extracts from daily stock register, duty payment register, etc. Upon verification of these documents, the original authority found the party eligible for refund to the extent of Rs.2,01,761/-, subject to limitation and unjust enrichment. It proceeded to examine the aspects of limitation and unjust enrichment and ultimately held agai....