<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (6) TMI 754 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246505</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal upheld the rejection of a refund claim for excess duty payment due to it being time-barred and lacking evidence to rebut unjust enrichment allegations. The appellant&#039;s failure to appear and insufficient challenge to the original authority&#039;s decision led to the dismissal of the appeal, emphasizing adherence to statutory timelines and the need for compelling evidence in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2014 16:26:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=353126" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (6) TMI 754 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246505</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal upheld the rejection of a refund claim for excess duty payment due to it being time-barred and lacking evidence to rebut unjust enrichment allegations. The appellant&#039;s failure to appear and insufficient challenge to the original authority&#039;s decision led to the dismissal of the appeal, emphasizing adherence to statutory timelines and the need for compelling evidence in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=246505</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>