Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2014 (4) TMI 10

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... appeal against Order-in-Appeal No.PII/BKS/478/2004 dated 29/10/2004 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs (Appeals), Pune-II. 2. Vide the impugned order the lower appellate authority has reduced the penalty imposed on the appellant from Rs.10 lakhs to Rs 71/2 lakhs. Aggrieved of the same, the Revenue is before me. 3. In the appeal memorandum it has been urged that, the appe....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... despite notice. 5. The only ground taken by the lower appellate authority for reduction of penalty is that the company was registered with the BIFR and since duty along with interest have already been paid, he took a lenient view and reduced the penalty. The hon'ble High Court of Bombay in Writ Petition No. 5868/2004 vide order dated 29/07/2004 has observed that, the respondent in the pres....