Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2014 (4) TMI 9

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Respondent : Mr Shobha Ram, Commissioner (AR) JUDGEMENT Per: S S Kang: 1. Heard both sides. 2. Applicant M/s. Larsen & Toubro Ltd filed application for waiver of duty of Rs.161,61,27,251/- and Rs.6,37,544/-, interest and penalty. The adjudicating authority has also confiscated the goods and imposed a redemption fine of Rs.374 crores. Other applicants filed applications for waiver of ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e they are liable to pay duty in respect of the parts which were cleared after packing, repacking, labeling, relabeling and affixing the MRP. 6. The contention is that in the present case the demand is beyond the normal period of limitation and in the case of JCB Ltd (supra) the Tribunal in the appeal filed by the Revenue only upheld the demand for the normal period of limitation. The applicant....