Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2006 (4) TMI 480

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....above writ petition is sought to be explained as follows: "It is most respectfully submitted that the impugned order was received in the Office of the Deputy Commissioner (CT), Salem, on October 23, 2001 and after calling for the relevant assessment records and after having prepared the necessary review report the records were forwarded to the Principal Commissioner and Commissioner of Commercial Taxes on January 7, 2002. The Legal Wing of the Commercial Taxes Department, after considering the merits of the case and the issues involved thought it fit to circulate the files for obtaining legal opinion on the feasibility of agitating the matter further and therefore the records were sent on August 28, 2002. On receipt of opinion, the neces....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... be they citizens or otherwise, cannot get discretionary relief obtainable thereunder unless they fully satisfy the High Court that the facts and circumstances of the case clearly justified the laches or undue delay on their part in approaching the court for grant of such discretionary relief. In a catena of decisions, the honourable Supreme Court of India has laid down the principles of law to be applied in the matter of exercise of discretionary power under article 226 of the Constitution of India, when there is laches and undue delay in approaching the court for remedy. Some of such decisions are: (a) Tilokchand Motichand v. H. B. Munshi, Commissioner of Sales Tax [1970] 25 STC 289 (SC); [1969] 1 SCC 119; AIR 1970 SC 898. (b) Af....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ough perhaps not waiving that remedy, yet put the other party in a situation, in which it would not be reasonable to place him if the remedy were afterwards to be asserted; in either of these cases, lapse of time and delay are most material . . . Two circumstances, always important in such cases, are, the length of the delay and the nature of the acts done during the interval, which might affect either party and cause a balance of justice or injustice in taking the one course or the other, so far as it relates to the remedy." The underlying object is that the courts do not encourage agitation of stale claims and exhuming matters which have already been disposed of or where the rights of third parties have accrued in the meantime, or wher....