https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162837 The High Court dismissed the writ petition due to a significant delay of 1,163 days in filing the petition, emphasizing the discretionary power under article 226 of the Constitution of India. The court highlighted that relief under article 226 cannot be granted if there is undue delay on the petitioner's part, citing various decisions and emphasizing the importance of approaching the court promptly for relief. The court underscored that delay and laches can be grounds for refusing relief under article 226, aiming to prevent the agitation of stale claims and protect the rights of third parties. en-us Mon, 24 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 15 Mar 2014 12:01:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162837 The High Court dismissed the writ petition due to a significant delay of 1,163 days in filing the petition, emphasizing the discretionary power under article 226 of the Constitution of India. The court highlighted that relief under article 226 cannot be granted if there is undue delay on the petitioner's part, citing various decisions and emphasizing the importance of approaching the court promptly for relief. The court underscored that delay and laches can be grounds for refusing relief under article 226, aiming to prevent the agitation of stale claims and protect the rights of third parties. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 24 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=162837