Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2002 (7) TMI 777

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... unfortunate that the authorities below including the Sales Tax Tribunal, Punjab, shut their eyes to the patent facts which were available on the record and directed the petitioner to deposit tax on the basis of the assessment made by the assessing officer. Petitioner is a manufacturing unit engaged in the production of wiremesh which is used in the poultry farms, etc. It has been given exemption ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948 (for short "the Act") and also under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. Feeling aggrieved by the orders of assessment, the petitioner preferred appeals before the Deputy Excise and Taxation Commissioner, Patiala, both under the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948 as also under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. The memorandum of appeal was accompanied by an applic....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....on Commissioner, Patiala. It is against these orders that the present petition has been filed under article 226 of the Constitution. 2.. Notice of motion was issued. Learned Additional AdvocateGeneral, Punjab, appeared on behalf of respondent No. 1 on May 16, 2002 and sought time to file reply on behalf of the respondent. He was allowed three weeks time but no reply has been filed so far. Not onl....